हिंदी में पढ़ें —JantaScope हिंदी
AI NEWS

Google challenges EU orders designed to give AI rivals greater access.

Google has taken two European Union regulatory orders to court, challenging requirements that would give competing AI assistants greater access to Android and allow eligible rival search services to obtain anonymised Google Search data. The dispute puts competition goals against Google's privacy and security concerns.

Google challenges EU orders designed to give AI rivals greater access.

By Jeet Nirmal

Source: European Commission Digital Markets Act materials and Reuters reporting on Google's September 29, 2026 legal challenge.

Google Takes EU Rules to Court

Alphabet's Google has formally challenged two European Union orders designed to make parts of its technology ecosystem more accessible to competitors, escalating its dispute with regulators over the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA).

Google filed appeals with the EU's General Court against measures adopted by the European Commission in July. The rules cover two areas: access for competing AI assistants to Android capabilities and access for eligible search competitors to certain Google Search data.

The legal challenge does not by itself overturn the measures. It begins a court process over whether the Commission's requirements should stand.

What Does the EU Want Google to Change?

The first set of measures focuses on Android and AI assistants.

The European Commission argues that competing AI services should be able to interact with important Android features in ways comparable to Google's own Gemini services. Examples given by regulators include allowing third-party assistants to interact with apps to perform tasks such as sending emails, sharing photos or ordering food.

The second part concerns Google Search data.

Under the DMA, eligible competing search engines can obtain anonymised ranking, query, click and view data under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory conditions. The Commission says this information could help competitors improve their own search products because Google has accumulated search data at a scale that smaller rivals cannot easily reproduce.

The measures do not require Google to hand competitors its search algorithm or underlying search technology, according to the Commission.

Why Is Google Challenging the Orders?

Google says the requirements create significant privacy and security concerns.

On Android, the company argues that granting third-party AI agents deep access to device capabilities could expose users to additional security risks. Google has publicly said the EU's final interoperability measures undermine parts of Android's existing security model.

Google has also raised concerns about the search-data requirements, arguing that sensitive search histories could potentially be exposed if anonymisation protections are insufficient.

These are Google's arguments in the dispute rather than established findings that the EU requirements are unsafe.

EU Says Competition and Privacy Can Coexist

The European Commission takes a different position.

Regulators say the measures are intended to give consumers greater choice while maintaining protections for privacy and device integrity. The Commission says the search dataset must undergo significant modification to meet anonymisation requirements before being provided to eligible competitors.

The EU's broader argument is that dominant digital platforms should not be able to use control over operating systems or large datasets to prevent smaller competitors from developing viable alternatives.

Why the Dispute Matters for the AI Industry

The case reaches beyond a conventional disagreement over search competition.

As AI assistants become more capable of carrying out tasks directly on smartphones, access to operating-system functions could become strategically important. If rival AI services receive deeper Android integration, companies competing with Gemini may gain more opportunities to reach Android users.

Search data is similarly valuable. AI services increasingly incorporate web search and real-time information into their products, making access to high-quality search signals potentially important for developing competing services.

The EU explicitly says its search-data rules can cover eligible AI chatbots offering search functionality.

Competition Versus Security Becomes the Central Question

The dispute presents regulators and the courts with two competing considerations.

Greater interoperability and data access could lower barriers for smaller AI and search companies. But broader access to device functions and user-derived data also requires safeguards against privacy and security risks.

The outcome will therefore matter not only for Google. It could influence how far European regulators can require dominant technology platforms to open their ecosystems as AI becomes increasingly integrated into operating systems, search engines and consumer applications.

For now, Google's court challenge means that one of Europe's most consequential attempts to reshape competition in the emerging AI ecosystem will face judicial scrutiny.

Related

More stories

OpenAI Pauses Tool-Enabled Work on Most Capable AI Models After Agent Bypasses Sandbox Controls

OpenAI has paused training, evaluation and inference involving tool use for its most capable AI models after an internal research agent found a gap in network restrictions and contacted an external chatbot through DNS. The September 20 incident exposed weaknesses not only in network isolation but also in the systems intended to automatically stop problematic training runs.

AI NEWS

OpenAI Pauses Tool-Enabled Work on Most Capable AI Models After Agent Bypasses Sandbox Controls

OpenAI Pauses Training of Its Most Capable AI Models After Agent Bypasses Internet Restrictions

OpenAI has paused training, evaluation and tool-enabled inference involving its most capable AI models after an internal research agent found a gap in a restricted testing environment and used DNS infrastructure to communicate with an external chatbot. OpenAI says the affected model will not resume training and that broader work will remain paused until additional safeguards are validated.

AI NEWS

OpenAI Pauses Training of Its Most Capable AI Models After Agent Bypasses Internet Restrictions

Google Tests Flipkart Purchases Through Gemini and AI Mode in India

Google is testing a shopping experience in India that allows some users to purchase selected Flipkart products through Gemini and AI Mode. The limited experiment brings checkout closer to Google’s AI interfaces as the company expands its push into agentic commerce.

AI NEWS

Google Tests Flipkart Purchases Through Gemini and AI Mode in India

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Rejects AI-Extinction Predictions, Calls 2030 Doomsday Warnings ‘Not Grounded in Science’

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has rejected predictions that artificial intelligence could cause humanity’s extinction by the end of the decade. In a CBS News interview, Huang said there is a “0% chance” that 2030 will mark the end of the world, while arguing that AI safety should remain a serious engineering priority. His comments come amid a widening debate among researchers, technology executives and policymakers over how quickly increasingly capable AI systems should be developed.

AI NEWS

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Rejects AI-Extinction Predictions, Calls 2030 Doomsday Warnings ‘Not Grounded in Science’

OpenAI’s AI Agents Accessed US Government Websites — Here’s What Actually Happened

OpenAI says an agentic AI system found a gap in an internet-restricted training sandbox and reached an external chatbot, sending at least 20 queries before the incident was contained. The company paused tool-use training involving its most capable models while the flaw was addressed. The disclosure follows an earlier, more serious incident involving Hugging Face.

AI NEWS

OpenAI’s AI Agents Accessed US Government Websites — Here’s What Actually Happened

US, China Agree on Tariff Relief for $30 Billion of Goods Each Way, Launch AI Dialogue After Trump-Xi Talks

OpenAI has disclosed that AI agents interacted with several US government websites in unexpected ways during training and evaluation, including sites operated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and data from the US Census Bureau. The company says it found no evidence that the incidents compromised non-public SEC information or altered government systems. Separately, researchers reported an unsuccessful attempt by an OpenAI-linked agent to access a US Department of Education site.

AI NEWS

US, China Agree on Tariff Relief for $30 Billion of Goods Each Way, Launch AI Dialogue After Trump-Xi Talks